There are multiple genes that can affect fruit color in tomatoes. Although the major genes have individual effects, it is often the interaction between these major genes that produces the fruit color phenotype. What we see as fruit color is a combination of pigmentation in three separate tissue types; the epidermis, a sub-epidermal layer, and the fruit pericarp (flesh). The genes listed below describe most of the known major genes controlling fruit color, and the various alleles of those genes with their associated phenotypes. A few uncommonly found genes/alleles are omitted to try and simplify an already complicated matrix of gene interactions determining the fruit color phenotype. Most of this information is from a thorough literature review on this topic, and combined with some personal experience and observation when appropriate.
In this document the wild type allele (responsible for the typical phenotype in cultivated tomatoes) is noted as + and mutant alleles at a locus are noted by the allele abbreviation (see TGRC list of accepted allele abbreviations), either in lower case (if the allele is recessive to the wild type), or upper case (if the allele is dominant to the wild type). Thus +/+ denotes that the plant is homozygous for the wild type allele at a particular locus (gene) and exhibits the wild type phenotype; t/t notes the plant is homozygous for the recessive “t” allele at the tangerine locus and has the tangerine phenotype; and Del/+ notes the plant is heterozygous for the dominant Del allele at the delta-carotene locus and has the Del phenotype. The “-“ character denotes that all alleles have an equal effect on phenotype, for example at the tangerine locus +/- means either +/+ or +/t, since either will result in the wild type phenotype.
Major genes responsible for fruit color in tomatoes
Pigmentation in the Epidermis and Sub-epidermis
In tomato fruit the epidermis is a single layer of cells designed to protect the fruit from desiccation and mechanical injury. In the wild type tomato the epidermis is yellow (Y allele). This coloration is due to the flavonoid pigment naringenin chalcone which is embedded in the cuticle. It is thought that this pigmentation protects against UV radiation and may provide some protection against pathogens. The biosynthetic pathway for naringenin chalcone is controlled by a myb12 transcription factor. The recessive y allele is due to a loss of function mutation in this myb12 gene, resulting in a clear cuticle without significant naringenin chalcone pigmentation. The myb12 loss of function associated with the y allele also results in a cuticle that is thinner, lower in cutin content, and with less elasticity (see photo and graphs below). Myb12 also has broad effects on flavonoid and carotenoid pathways beyond the cuticle and the y allele is associated with generally lower levels of these compounds in the fruit (reference).
In the presence of the genes Aft and atv, anthocyanin pigment is accumulated in a few layers of cells in the fruit epidermis and sub-epidermis (see Breeding the Blue Tomato). Both genes were introgressed from wild relatives and are up-regulated by direct exposure to UV light. There is considerable variation in intensity of pigmentation among Aft/Aft atv/atv plants, strongly suggesting an epistatic effect from one or more unknown modifier genes.
Yellow fruit with indigo |
Epidermal peal of yellow/indigo |
We have found there can also be sub-epidermal accumulation of carotenoid pigments. As a result, the color of the “skin” may be very different than the color of the flesh. We have developed several lines with red or reddish orange pigmentation of the sub-epidermis with yellow or green flesh (see photos). There is no previous report of this phenomenon in the literature. This trait is heritable and appears to be controlled by a single recessive gene. Last year we identified plants with a green sub-epidermis and red flesh. Although there appears to be considerable potential to modify “skin color” independent of flesh color in tomatoes, there is much to be learned.
2013 taste test winner - green on red |
The green stripe trait, which is governed by the recessive gs allele, causes chlorophyll accumulation in irregular stripes in the fruit epidermis/sub-epidermis of unripe fruit, changing to stripes of various colors in mature fruit (see Genetic Control of Fruit Stripes in Tomato). The pattern of the stripes can vary widely, though the genetic basis for this variation is not understood. The color of the stripes in mature fruit is determined in part by flesh color, but also subject to other factors, yet unknown. In particular some striped tomatoes have metallic silver, bronze, green of gold stripes – the nature of which is currently a mystery (see photo)
Painted with metallic green |
Orange w/ broad gold stripes |
Fruit stripes are dark longitudinal stripes that develop on ripening tomato fruit in the sub-epidermis. In the literature this trait is described as being controlled by a dominant “Fs” allele. Our experience is that the trait is very sensitive to environment, not consistently expressed, and that dominance appears to be incomplete. Fs/Fs in combination with gs/gs can give some very interesting striping patterns (e.g. Beauty Queen), and Fs/Fs in a Aft/Aft – atv/atvbackground has shown a very striking tiger-like striping (see Siberian/Bengal Tiger blog).
Bengal Tiger |
Freckles are another possible feature of the epidermis that can significantly alter fruit phenotype. A detailed discussion on what is known about the genetic control of freckles can be found here, but there is little reported in the literature and still a lot is not well understood. One interesting manifestation of this trait is in combination with the anthocyanin fruit phenotype, with gold/yellow flecks on a indigo background (see photo below).
Freckled Indigo |
Pericarp pigmentation
Coloration of the tomato pericarp (flesh) is a result of accumulation of various carotenoid pigments. The pathway for biosynthesis of these various carotenoid compounds is illustrated below. In the next few paragraphs the common mutations that lead to variations from the wild type phenotype are described, discussed and illustrated (our photos unless noted otherwise).
Coloration of the tomato pericarp (flesh) is a result of accumulation of various carotenoid pigments. The pathway for biosynthesis of these various carotenoid compounds is illustrated below. In the next few paragraphs the common mutations that lead to variations from the wild type phenotype are described, discussed and illustrated (our photos unless noted otherwise).
"Wild type" |
At an independent locus, the tangerine gene “t” is responsible for the vast majority of tomatoes with orange flesh. The recessive t allele is the result of a loss of function mutation in the gene coding for the enzyme CRTISO which causes an accumulation of prolycopene (orange pigment) rather than lycopene (red pigment). A plant homozygous for this mutation (t/t) will be dark orange in combination with R/- and lighter orange in combination with r/r. The double recessive r/r - t/t has a 90% reduction to total carotenoid pigments compared to t/t in a R/- background (reference and photo). It has been recently shown that prolycopene, a cis isomer of lycopene, is 5x more efficiently utilized by humans than its red wild type trans-lycopene cousin (reference).
F3 segregating for the t allele (red/tangerine) |
At another independent locus, the “Del” allele of the delta-carotene gene is a much less common determinate of orange flesh in cultivated tomatoes. This gene was found in various wild relatives and has been introgressed into tomatoes. Crtl-e is an enzyme that converts lycopene to delta-carotene. In the wild type the gene controlling this enzyme is only very weakly expressed during fruit maturation. The Del allele of this gene is expressed 30x higher than the wild type leading to an increase in delta-carotene concentration and a corresponding decrease in lycopene content. Del has functional incomplete dominance and Del/+ plants have red/orange flesh with <50% of total pigment being delta-carotene and Del/Del plants having orange/red flesh with >50% of the total pigment being delta-carotene. Like tangerine gene, the phenotypic expression of the Del phenotype is partially dependent on the genotype at the R locus.
Del (photo by Keith Mueller) |
Del + high pigment (hp1/hp1) - Mueller photo |
UC Davis TGRC photo |
In wild type tomatoes the gene coding for the Lcy-B enzyme, that converts lycopene to beta-carotene, is expressed at a low level in ripening fruit - lycopene content is normally >50x the content of beta-carotene. There are two important variants of the Lcy-B gene, alleles which can significantly alter the red fleshed wild type phenotype. The “B” allele was introduced from tomato wild relatives and greatly increases expression of Lcy-B, resulting in increased beta-carotene content at the expense of lycopene – resulting in orange fruit. "B" is inherited as a dominant allele. The second variant “ bog” (AKA old gold crimson) is a loss of function mutant for the gene coding for Lcy-B and reduces the normally low levels of beta-carotene to near zero, with a corresponding increase in lycopene content. Crimson type tomatoes, with elevated lycopene content are bog/bog in a red fleshed background (see photo).
Crimson striped mini-heart |
at/at - photo by Keith Mueller |
Recently scientists have identified several QTL markers, associated with independent genes of unknown function, that enhance lycopene concentration in tomato fruit (reference). These are independent of, and perhaps additive to, bog/bog (i.e. crimson trait).
The Green ripe trait is one of several that affect normal fruit maturation. The mutant Gr allele (allelic to Nr – never ripe) is a deletion in a wild type gene that has the effect of making the fruit less sensitive to the plant hormone ethylene. Ethylene governs many key steps in fruit maturation and plants containing the Gr allele (Gr/-) make fruit that never fully ripen. The color of ripe fruit is green with a yellowing blush, often with a red/pink center. The fruit remains very firm and does not significantly accumulate sugars, acids or other flavor compounds. The delayed ripening genes “rin” and “nor” when homozygous, give a similar fruit phenotype. Plants that are rin/+ or nor/+ have normal fruit coloration and delayed fruit senescence (see Fountain of Youth blog).
As fruit of wild type tomato plants mature, concentration of the green photosynthetic pigment chlorophyll decreases and carotenoid pigments increase – chloroplasts become chromoplasts, and the fruit begin to turn their predestined color: red, orange or yellow. The green flesh allele “gf” is a loss of function mutant in SGR1, a gene responsible for producing a protein required for chlorophyll breakdown in maturing tomato fruit. It was recently reported that there are at least five independent loss of function mutations in this gene, giving rise to several alleles of gf, all with the same gf phenotype. Tomato plants homozygous for this recessive mutation (gf/gf) retain chlorophyll in mature fruit, but also accumulate their normal carotenoid pigments as determined by the major genes described above. In the presence of retained chlorophyll, fruit predestined to have red flesh become muddy brown (AKA “black”), pink becomes purple, orange becomes orangish/green and yellow becomes green when ripe (GWR).
gf/gf F2 segregate (Michael Pollan x Cowlicks Brandywine) |
In tomatoes the term bicolor generally refers to fruit that has some combination of two (or three) flesh colors, in a vast array of potential patterns. As discussed earlier, the ry allele at the R locus confers red steaks in yellow flesh (e.g. Big Rainbow and many others) with blotchy red pigmentation often evident even on the fruit surface. In a gf/gf background ry/ry probably leads to red streaks in green flesh, as in the variety Berkeley Tie Dye and others. However, there are much more complex combination of bi/tri-color flesh pigmentation (see photos) not easily explained by these or any other combinations of the genes discussed above.
Typical genotypes for common fruit colors in tomato
Fruit Phenotype | Y locus | R locus | T locus | B locus | Gf locus | example |
Red fruit | +/- | +/- | +/- | +/+ | +/- | Big Boy |
Pink fruit | y/y | +/- | +/- | +/+ | +/- | Brandywine |
Brown (black) fruit | +/- | +/- | +/- | +/+ | gf/gf | Black from Tula |
Purple fruit | y/y | +/- | +/- | +/+ | gf/gf | Cherokee Purple |
Yellow fruit | +/- | r/r | +/- | +/+ | +/- | Yellow Pear |
“White” fruit | y/y | r/r | +/- | +/+ | +/- | Blonde Boar |
Orange (tangerine) | -/- | -/- | t/t | +/+ | -/- | Woodle Orange |
Orange (b-carotene) | -/- | -/- | +/- | B/- | -/- | Caro-red |
Crimson fruit | -/- | +/- | +/- | bog/bog | +/- | Tasti-Lee |
GWR fruit | y/y | r/r | +/- | +/+ | gf/gf | Green Zebra |
Yellow/red bicolor | +/- | ry/ ry | +/- | +/+ | +/- | Big Rainbow |
Green/red bicolor | +/- | ry/ ry | +/- | +/+ | gf/gf | Captain Lucky |
Not just for color
The degradation of carotenoid pigments leads to the formation of numerous aromatic/volatile compounds that affect tomato flavor. This is particularly true for the +/- red wild type, crimson, tangerine and delta-carotene type tomatoes, and much less so for the r/r, B/- and at/at low lycopene types (reference). As we hopefully learn more about particular volatile compounds and their effect on flavor – a breeding strategy for manipulating pigment types/concentrations may one path for better tasting tomatoes.
The carotenoid and flavonoid compounds found in tomato also have direct benefits in human nutrition. These compounds generally are very effective anti-oxidants, and have demonstrated significant anti-cancer activity. Beta-carotene is also a direct precursor for vitamin A.
Summary
Our primary interest in better understanding the genetics and inheritance of fruit color in tomatoes is to better predict the phenotype of crosses between various types, and to best design selection strategies for achieving complex combinations of colors, stripes, etc. The fact that we continue to get unexpected results from crosses and find a few very novel phenotypes not described in the literature – suggests to us there are still a lot of unknown genetic factors at work, probably mostly modifier genes with an epistatic effect on one or more of the major genes described above.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar